Hi Thomas

The compliance specification and checklist template have been in place. We have just completed the compliance test for Dragonboard 410c and HiKey. The test reports will be sent to board vendors today to respond/address the non-compliant areas.

The community is of course still the target audience and there is no change of 96Boards efforts and what we are hoping to achieve with community support.

We will be publishing latest work in the upcoming Linaro BKK16 Connect.


Director of 96Boards

On 5 February 2016 at 11:06, Thomas B. Rücker <thomas@ruecker.fi> wrote:
Hello everyone,

About 3 months have silently passed, without anything visibly changing.
I can't help but ask myself if Linaro has abandoned the 96borad effort
in its original form and resolved to make it a mostly Linaro internal
project. Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't mind, even in such a form it
would ultimately benefit the broader audience in terms of better
upstream support of ARMv7 and AArch64.

I do think though, that "the community" deserves to know if they are
still part of the target audience and can count on any form of support.
Personally I have a bit of a "Pandaboard past OMAPgeddon" feeling at the


Dev mailing list