On 15/04/15 13:14, Leo Yan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan leo.yan@linaro.org
Would like to see a comment here.
The patch could easily be divorced from the cover letter if we end up with a delay upstreaming these changes. Then there is more work needed to rediscover what the patch is for.
arch/arm64/boot/dts/hi6220.dtsi | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hi6220.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hi6220.dtsi index 2f7f8a1..e882dcc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hi6220.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/hi6220.dtsi @@ -300,15 +300,31 @@ pinctrl-single,register-width = <32>; pinctrl-single,function-mask = <7>; pinctrl-single,gpio-range = <
&range 0 1 1
&range 2 24 1
&range 28 8 1
&range 43 21 1
&range 74 6 1
&range 80 42 0
&range 122 1 1
&range 126 33 1
&range 80 8 0 /* gpio 3: [0..7] */
&range 88 8 0 /* gpio 4: [0..7] */
&range 96 8 0 /* gpio 5: [0..7] */
&range 104 8 0 /* gpio 6: [0..7] */
&range 112 8 0 /* gpio 7: [0..7] */
&range 120 2 0 /* gpio 8: [0..1] */
&range 2 6 1 /* gpio 8: [2..7] */
&range 8 8 1 /* gpio 9: [0..7] */
&range 0 1 1 /* gpio 10: [0] */
&range 16 7 1 /* gpio 10: [1..7] */
&range 23 3 1 /* gpio 11: [0..2] */
&range 28 5 1 /* gpio 11: [3..7] */
&range 33 3 1 /* gpio 12: [0..2] */
&range 43 5 1 /* gpio 12: [3..7] */
&range 48 8 1 /* gpio 13: [0..7] */
&range 56 8 1 /* gpio 14: [0..7] */
&range 74 6 1 /* gpio 15: [0..5] */
&range 122 1 1 /* gpio 15: [6] */
&range 126 1 1 /* gpio 15: [7] */
&range 127 8 1 /* gpio 16: [0..7] */
&range 135 8 1 /* gpio 17: [0..7] */
&range 143 8 1 /* gpio 18: [0..7] */
&range 151 8 1 /* gpio 19: [0..7] */
Does this refactor old stuff and add new stuff in the same patch?
If so might be better for this to be two patches (where first one tidies up but makes no functional change).