On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz marcin.juszkiewicz@linaro.org wrote:
W dniu 13.04.2016 o 13:12, Thomas B. Rücker pisze:
On 04/04/2016 12:28 PM, Thomas B. Rücker wrote:
On 03/24/2016 01:43 PM, Thomas B. Rücker wrote:
So, LC BKK came and went, and now I'm back, sounding like a broken record:
- Compliance report: HiKey (CCo)
- Compliance report: HiKey (LeMaker)
- Compliance report: Dragonboard410c
- Compliance report: Bubblegum
- Compliance report: Cello
- Compliance report: Husky
- Compliance Check-List
- Other latest work (cf. mail on this list 2016-02-05T11:11)
- Anything of significance at LCBKK?
I would love to see them too. And patches for mainline kernel too ;D
I would love to have them published also, but we're simply not there yet.
However, we've made a lot more progress than Thomas' comments give us credit for. The latest reference platform build supports Dragonboard, Hikey, as well as 5 EE boards, all with the same v4.4 kernel binary. Production of a compliance test kit is in progress -- which includes a test mezzanine adapter. Patches for Dragonboard and HiKey are flowing into mainline. On hikey we've got free software firmware right from first instruction outside the masked rom (arm trusted firmware, UEFI, and OP-TEE). And besides, we got 64-bit ARM hardware into the hands of developers a year before any of the other platforms became available.
In the absence of the formal compliance report, Linaro has reserved the right from day one to say which boards we will allow to be marketed as a 96Boards compatible project. There are boards that we have rejected due to lack of commitment from the vendor. It isn't the free-for-all that has been implied.
g.