On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:56 AM, David Mandala david.mandala@linaro.org wrote:
On 10/27/15 9:26 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:06 AM, David Mandala david.mandala@linaro.org wrote:
On 10/27/15 1:25 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
Second posting. I've made some changes to the design. Things to note:
- VIO is selectable between 3.3V and 5V with a slider switch
- A through-hole stackable header is used
- silkscreen is cleaner
I think that covers all the outstanding comments. Attached are the schematic, design files, and a rendering.
Comments welcome. I hope to send this for a pre-production run next week.
g.
Inline image 1
Grant,
This looks very nice, so +1 from me.
Do you have a mechanical layout with measurements for each connector? If so I can get started on the Case additions for this now.
Look a the Sensors-layout.pdf file that I sent you. All of the information you need should be there.
g.
Grant,
Whoops I missed that.
That is most of what I need but P2, P3, P4, P5 are missing Y coordinates, 96B_SPI, P6, SW1 are missing x and y info.
Try the attached file.
I'm guessing that 96B_SPI GPIO2 and I2C0 are 7mm apart from the row above but it's not called out. If so that takes care of the y for them, but still
Correct
need the X for 96B_SPI it's smaller then the connectors above it.
Done
I am assuming that: A0, D7 A1, D6 A2, A6, I2C1 top D5 AT-I2C GPIO3 I2C1 bottom D4 respectively share the same Y offsets.
Yes
I am also assuming that AT-I2C, GPIO1, I2C0 and D3 y offset is 0 the front edge of the board.
Nominally, yes. No guarantees though.
g.