On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:06 AM Frank Rowand email@example.com wrote:
On 08/23/18 03:33, Linus Walleij wrote:
- Some indication that binding the connector like this will not implicate or screw things up for the DT-overlays idea, i.e. a both/and and not either/or approach.
For the moment, NACK since there is not a substantive change from before. This is without having read beyond this introduction.
So I guess you disagree with the previous statement, and I need some elaboration to understand exactly what in this approach works counter to the goals of DT overlays.
It's not like I'm overly infatuated with my own approach, but I want to get to a point where people can start to use these daughterboards no matter whether they use DT or ACPI.
I'm missing ACPI input though, the DT people are more responsive :/
I will read through the rest of the series and revisit my previous conclusions, but most likely not for a few days.
OK no problem there is no immediate hurry.
Yours, Linus Walleij