On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 3:02 PM Frank Rowand frowand.list@gmail.com wrote:
Agreeing with Rob (despite my other reply asking why the current devicetree mechanisms can't be used)
I think I answer also your comments in my reply to Rob, please check!
that we do have a desire to have the ability to create bindings for connectors - this has been discussed before.
Let's create bindings for connectors.
But I have this caveat: let's create a binding for connectors that does not stipulate that its children must be populated using overlays, but could optionally be bound to driver that populate the children any way the OS want to do this.
Yours, Linus Walleij